ABBOTT 0, GILLARD 1
RC into child and Abbott abuse
Four-time Walkley Award winning political commentator and Churchill Fellow, has returned to the fray over concern that the integrity of news dissemination is continually being threatened by a partisan media.
When your political opponent looks at his watch when you’re speaking and you are a dumb red-head who can’t match him verbally, there is always a Royal Commission into child abuse to target his hallowed institution of Catholicism. It’s only a few hundred million bucks but it strikes a dagger in his heart, and it’s payback in spades.
But make sure you get Mark Dreyfus to draw up some canny terms of reference so that Labor’s Islamic base is unaffected. Don’t worry about aged Islamic bearded blokes wedding 9 year-olds or betrothed infants copping a good thighing. Hey that’s a small price to pay for Abbott’s mate Pell going to hell.
How do you say paedophilia in Arabic?
And don’t mention FGM and the criminal legislation that is available as a remedy but ignored in favour of cultural differences. Or the thousands of butchered, septicemia-stricken little girls Victorian hospitals are trying to mend.
The thousands of abused Australians who Gillard exclusively targeted as victims will finally feel vindicated and paedophilia will take a hammering, but this RC was not about punishment it was about people finally being able to tell their stories and be believed.
The time and cost is of debatable value when there will be no prosecutions other than Australia’s number one Catholic.
If we marry women we'll need divorce
So, will the Pope now allow frustrated priests to marry? Maybe on a trial basis, but that will not solve the problem as paedophilia is alive and well across all prospective deviates whether they be priests or atheists, married, single, homosexual, heterosexual, or just licentious misfits hiding behind their keyboards.
Oh well, I guess Gillard will be high-fiving herself in the bathroom mirror about now,
… and Abbott will be kicking the cat.