The Pickering Post
Sunday, 24th February 2019

If you would like to be involved or support the upkeep and further development of this site, it would be very welcome no matter how small.


MULTICULTURAL MONSTER PART TWO

The root of all evil

Kenneth Schultz

Kenneth Schultz is a researcher, political and social commentator and author of Western Civilization Under Siege, an important new book exposing the existential threats to Western civilization.

BLOG / WESTERN CIVILIZATION UNDER SIEGE



In Australia, following the initial moves of the Whitlam Labor government in 1973, further official national multicultural policies were implemented by Malcolm Fraser’s conservative Liberal government in 1978. The Labor government of Bob Hawke continued with these policies during the 1980s and early 1990s, and the policies were further supported by Paul Keating up until his electoral defeat in 1996. Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) policies continue to be implemented at all levels of government and public service, such as medical support systems which cater specifically to non-English-speaking residents.


Noticeboard in a Manchester UK hospital


The meaning of multiculturalism has changed significantly since its formal introduction to Australia. Originally, the mainstream population understood it as a need for acceptance of the fact that many members of the Australian community originally came from different cultures and still had ties to these cultures. However, it has since come to mean the rights of migrants within mainstream Australia to express their cultural identity.

The concept of multiculturalism was bolstered by a multitude of grants from governments, with an eye to capturing the ethnic vote, to a whole range of bodies to promote their separate identities and to lobby for more grants and influence. Ethnic councils have become a taxpayer-funded industry.

The Ford Foundation funded and promoted the establishment of multiculturalism in the United States

The multicultural idea first entered American politics through the universities, when a succession of Ford Foundation grants in the late 1960s and 1970s helped establish the politicized fields of Black Studies and Women’s Studies, with others to follow. These pseudo-disciplines celebrated ethnic, racial and gender separatism, fostering group identities over a core American identity. Their common theme was the race-gender-class oppression of designated groups by American capitalism.



The very first Black Studies program, created in 1967 at San Francisco State College as a concession to a student strike organized by radicals that shut down the school, set the pattern for other multicultural curricula that followed. The program dispensed with traditional academic subjects like science and math in favor of so-called “black science” and “black math” that emphasized racial consciousness and racial agendas. A second Black Studies program was created at Cornell University in 1969 when the school bowed to shotgun-wielding black student radicals who occupied the administration building and demanded the formation of a black studies department and the right to appoint their own professors. The demands were mostly granted.



Following this template, women’s studies programs were created following the principle that gender differences were not biologically based but “socially constructed” as part of a system of race, gender and class hierarchies designed to oppress racial minorities, women and transgender individuals, and low-to-moderate-income workers. At their core, each division of this new multicultural curriculum constituted an assault on the idea of a common national identity, and of America as a society based on the principles of equality and individual rights.

Franklin Thomas, who served as president of the Ford Foundation from 1979 to 1996, was instrumental in promoting multiculturalist agendas through strategic grant-making. In a September 12, 1990 media release, Thomas explained the Foundation’s intention to “broaden cultural and intellectual diversity in American higher education.”

Thomas added: “Most of us have little understanding of the diverse culture, attitudes, and experiences that make up our own societies. Unfortunately, this ignorance about other cultures breeds insensitivity and intolerance in young and old alike.” He sealed his theory with a strong bottom line: “To reach the roots of intolerance and improve campus life, we must make the teaching of non-Western cultures a basic element of undergraduate education.”


Learn about my culture so you can stop being so intolerant.


Toward that end, the Ford Foundation in 1990 “invited” 200 colleges to compete for grants of $100,000. There was a major stipulation, however. Any group or institution that received any money from the Foundation would be obliged to adhere to its affirmative action guidelines. To comply with those guidelines, Ford required every grant application to include a “diversity table” detailing the number of non-whites and women who were employed or served by the organization or school seeking assistance. Notably, the Foundation did not consider Asian Americans to be a minority group eligible for hiring preferences.


Wanted, Officer in charge of promoting racial tolerance. Slitty eyed gooks need not apply.


It had occurred to the Left that well-endowed foundations, with their enormous financial clout and appearance of being above politics, were the institutions best positioned to change the campus climate. Stripped of all the elegant rationales and academic persiflage, it was essentially a matter of using lucrative grants to bribe administrators into making the desired changes.



Comments

.......nah.....I'll be over in 'Fact' section looking for that thousand page volume called "Reasons why SillyB is a Fukwit"........it's going for free and they can't keep up with demand!!

Alongside those ULTRA thin 1 page comedy tomes "SillyB and Climate Change"..."SillyB and Politics" no doubt?

Jackoff read the novel, you'll find it in pulp fiction section of any good book store.

How about just 'moron' Sailor?..........indoctrination implies it has had SOME education!

"GOD was a single father"

The voice in your head tell you that fukwit?

Jeebus el christo.......why is this even news......or a topic for digust.....sorry...discussion?

Sailor, indoctrinated morons would have had the patter continually drummed into them...which results in the substandard and myopic approach to any topic..........given the completely random, inane, uneducated and willfully ignorant posts and replies we get from stinkysmegma one can correctly assume that it is too fucking stupid to even be trained as an indoctrinated moron!

Standards that are being whiteanted away Pabs.

Now we need Walpeed to tell us when we should have Australia Day ,how long before we have National Muslim Day ?

Disgusting woman - nick off back to her own country - not required here, and take Julie Bishop with her

Washington Has Appointed A President For Venezuela
.
Paul Craig Roberts
.
After listening since 2016 to the American presstitutes complain, without providing a mere scrap of evidence, of Russia meddling in US elections, a person would think that the last thing Washington would do would be to meddle in other countries’ elections.
.
Unfortunately, that is not the case. Washington routinely meddles but now has gone far beyond mere meddling. Washington has this day (January 23, 2019) declared that the elected president of Venezuela, Nicolas Maduro, is no longer the Venezuelan president. Washington, not the Venezulan people, has decided who is Venezuela’s president. Declaring the elected government to be “illegitimate,” President Trump elected by diktat the Venezuelan president: “Today, I am officially recognizing the President of the Venezuelan National Assembly, Juan Guaido, as the Interim President of Venezuela.” https://www.rt.com/news/449533-trump-recognizes-venezuela-opposition/
.
Clearly, Gaido is in Washington’s pocket or Washington would not have chosen him.
.
Maduro, like Chavez before him, has committed the unpardonable crime of representing the Venezuelan people instead of American corporate and financial interests. Washington simply does not tolerate Latin American governments that represent Latin American people. As US Marine General Smedley Buttler said, he and his Marines made Latin America safe for the United Fruit Company and investments by US banks.
.
So, now Venezuela has two presidents. One elected by the people, and one appointed by Washington. How long before Washington does this to Russia, China, Iran, Syria, Turkey, India?
.
Washington managed to frame and remove from power the female reformist president of Argentina and to replace her with a right-wing Washington puppet.
.
Washington managed to frame, remove from power, and imprison the leaders of the reformist party in Brazil and to install a right-wing Washington puppet.
.
Washington managed to dispose of the reformist government in Ecuador, install a Washington puppet, and use him against Julian Assange.
.
Washington interferred in the French election by framing the likely socialist candidate, Dominique Strauss-Kahn on a bogus rape charge that fell apart after removing Strauss-Kahn from contention.
.
The American leftwing blames Washington for the overthrow of the Allende government in Chile, although my views on this are different. Nevertheless, the claim fits the pattern.
.
The reformist government in Bolivia is also under Washington pressure.
.
Somehow, the rest of the world does not become outraged by Washington’s massive interference in the political affairs of other countries. Even Russia’s Vladimir Putin accepts Washington’s interferrence in Russian elections and Ukraine’s elections. Washington’s bullying, like Israel’s bullying, is somehow acceptable to countries that are far too powerful to have to accept it.
.
Read on -
.
https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2019/01/23/washington-has-appointed-a-president-for-venezuela/
.
So if Australia chose Fraser Anning as PM how would Washington react?

Is Mary Jackson a virgin ?

In 1923, Who Was:

1. President of the largest steel company?
2. President of the largest gas company?
3. President of the New York stock Exchange?
4. Greatest wheat speculator?
5. President of the Bank of International Settlement?
6. Great Bear of Wall Street?

These men were considered some of the world’s most successful of their days..
Now, 80 years later do you know what ultimately became of them?

The Answers:

1. The president of the largest steel company.
Charles Schwab, died a pauper.

2. The president of the largest gas company,
Edward Hopson, went insane.

3. The president of the NYSE,
Richard Whitney, was released from prison to die at home.

4 The greatest wheat speculator,
Arthur Cooger, died abroad, penniless.

5. The president of the Bank of International Settlement,
Leon Fraser, shot himself.

6 The Great Bear of Wall Street,
Cosabee Livermore, also committed suicide
However, in that same year, 1923, the PGA Champion and the winner of the most important golf tournament, the US Open, was Gene Sarazen.

What became of him?
He played golf until he was 92, died in 1999 at the age of 95. He was financially secure at the time of his death.
The Moral:
Fuck work.
Play golf.

But Billy, this is such a cute couple !

GOD was a single father

FRASER ANNING IS OUR NEW GUEST ...

New Post Up !!

interesting idea CS

"I dont gree with here poisition -" to difficult at your age as well your state of mind as allowing the schedule of taking time out of the consuming of the Carton of White Synthetic Wine plus the time of the day hey INKBLOT.JimJim: They sure breed em ugly in America.It must be on the application when applying for a job.1.Can Dress like a teenie bopper when your 70.2.Have to use Glue and masking tape to pull back all the loose folds on the face and Turkey Neck.3. The more famous you are the more you have to be outspoken and weird with your dressing.4.Employ Pioneer Concrete to put a base layer on the face before make up is Applied.

Bejewelled fckwits .