Charges against the HSU National Secretary and former ALP President, Michael Williamson involved $20 million defrauded from the HSU (East) branch. But the fraudster pled guilty to an amount of only $1 million. Now why would that be?

Williamson, who has a cell phone super-glued to his ear, was gone anyway, and the penalty for stealing a sheep is not that dissimilar to stealing a lamb. 

Prosecutors did a deal with Williamson’s counsel who bargained the amount down to a mere five percent of the amount stolen.

It was a win/win for Williamson and Labor as now there is no prosecution to unveil the depths of the filthy links between the two.

Williamson will serve time, he would have anyway, it was an open and shut case but now Labor and its union masters have been spared the public show of a prosecution process that would have unearthed the endemic fraud Labor has promoted and protected within its union base.

But the tactic will prove misplaced… at the time Williamson pled guilty there was no talk of a Royal Commission into unions, there is now!

Craig Thomson’s HSU hookers are small fish compared to Labor's numerous great white sharks.

619
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
266 Comment threads
353 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
116 Comment authors
cryptoniumTomWalshJackFrenchTruthWillOutJoBlow Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
Notify of
cryptonium
Member
cryptonium

Labor says our debt is not big, $667 Billion in one hundred dollar notes stacked on top of each other is 93,000 kilometres high. Fly me to the moon and let me play among the stars.

JackFrench
Member
JackFrench

Remember a few short years ago we “gave ” the EU $8 billion….how is that travelling….can we now get it back to bail out Holden, Ford and QANTAS?

JoBlow
Member
JoBlow

Because of the nature of the offense committed against a large number of lower income people, the Judge should start with the maximum penalty then start deducting off small amounts for each mitigating circumstance.

chrisk
Donor
chrisk

JB>>> I don’t think you are too far wrong on that one!

JoBlow
Member
JoBlow

I suspect a lot of the speech defective Laborites learned to speak in the remand yards of Pentridge in years gone by. Either there or in Boggo Road or the Bay!

chrisk
Donor
chrisk

mishka>>>> Hahahahaha, You certainly have the LABOR language down to a TEE mishka , I am sure they do not listen to themselves but even if they did, would they be bright enough to correct themselves for future occasions??? No, I am sure they wouldn’t, You only have to watch QT to see that they do not learn by mistakes even when it is pointed out to them in Black and White, they are hopeless. A speech impediment is a sad serious thing and thank God I do not have such an infliction, I will say, I can speak to… Read more »

mishka
Member
mishka

I think ‘pled’ sounds pretty good at this stage, as long as he pled guillty…hopefully to more than $1 million though!

mishka
Member
mishka

Dear Chris K – did you mean Labor Party persons seem to be ‘afflicted’ with speech impediments? If so, my sentiments exactly, as I expressed to my darling daughter who thinks they all have an impediment, and not necessarily related to speech! Although wiv (with), fort (thought), fink (think), fing or nuffink (thing or nothing) etc. are outstanding. Our son had a slight lisp and it was fixed up in no time at the age of five with a few ‘games’ with a speech pathologist…not taking action early is laziness or denial. Let’s have Australians speaking ‘real proper’, especially those… Read more »

chrisk
Donor
chrisk

oh and mishka>>> I guess I am just getting too old and becoming a picky , grumpy old man hahaha

JackFrench
Member
JackFrench

TW..We don’t owe money to foreign countries or foreign companies….we owe it to international bankers…..therein lies the root cause of the problem…..our history is one of sovereign nations going bankrupt to keep banks solvent …it should be the other way around……also…we did not have depressions and recessions prior to organised banks…..give it some thought….JF

mishka
Member
mishka

I think I had to do parsing and analysis AND spelling in primary school but my children have never heard of subjects and objects of verbs. Oh really – isn’t the ‘me’ in your example above objective case governed by the preposition ‘for’? Pet turnoff is ‘yous’.

chrisk
Donor
chrisk

out now for 5-6 hours so hope to hear from you this afternoon

chrisk
Donor
chrisk

JB>>>. The words to the song from West Side Story I have posted in the next story says it all have a read I thing you will have a laugh, let me know, its over 3-4 threads

JoBlow
Member
JoBlow

It’s to do with their lower socio-economic background and upbringing. Most are just plain bogan stupid!!

chrisk
Donor
chrisk

JB>>> Very Very sad when people are inflicted with a speech impediment I have a friend sadly with problems. but it appears that many of the labor party have this infliction, WHY? I am sure there are those in the LNP as well but not so prevalent.

JoBlow
Member
JoBlow

Yeah well their mum’s coulden afford to send em to proper schools so they never lerned to talk good!

1 4 5 6