Sixty-one prominent Australians, including rugby union's David Pocock and Nobel Prize-winning scientist Peter Doherty, and Lefty public servant and Climate Change Authoritarian, Bernie Fraser, wrote a letter to the Sydney Morning Herald calling for a moratorium on coal exports, saying our coal contributes to global warming.

Well you can excuse the rugby bloke, he has obviously copped too many hits to the head and you can forget the Nobel Prize bloke ‘cos one of the world’s most evil terrorists copped a Nobel prize and Bernie Fraser, well, sane people are tired of making excuses for the senile ol’ Bernie Fraser.

The world thrives on essential coal and it will do so for at least another 30 years. Australia has the cleanest coal and if our exports cease, South America and China itself will take up the slack themselves with their own dirty coal.

How does that help ol’ Bernie Fraser’s so-called C02 problem?

The most astonishing thing is that only 61 academic dickheads in Australia wanted to put their names to this letter to Fairfax. The letter did not note the names of those who had refused to sign it.

As reported here earlier this year “Prepare for an avalanche of bullshit ahead of the IPCC’s Paris Conference.” And boy has there been some bullshit flying around, all orchestrated by the UN’s desperate little bunch of lying crooks that make up the IPCC!

Wasn’t Abbott’s highly successful “Direct Action” good enough for them? After all it has met all the targets and more! But Direct Action doesn’t raise the ten per cent of carbon tax the UN wants… Abbott successfully avoided this UN scam and showed that responsible people will reduce emissions anyway! Everyone wants cleaner air!

As suspected all along, the IPCC’s interest is not at all in global warming, because the globe is not warming. The IPCC is a tool of a corrupt UN and has been tasked with devising the biggest hoax ever imposed on unwitting voters who will in turn convince reactive governments to comply and pay up.

The global warming hoax is directed at us the idiot voters, not governments or their ministers!

Don’t tell me you haven’t noticed a plethora of old National Geographic and Discovery Channel docos on starving polar bears atop melting icebergs.

Don’t tell me you haven’t seen the repeated repeats of SBS and ABC rising seas and increasing temperatures programs! Neither of which is true of course but the unadulterated bullshit continues regardless.

Pollution they say! Okay, what about the millions of tons of burnt, raw kerosene being dumped in the atmosphere each day by the world’s airliners? Oooh! No mention of that! Why not? Well, jetA1 suffers sovereign taxes the UN can’t get their grubby little hands on ten per cent of.

No, no, the UN needs international carbon taxes, the concept of which can be sold to Left wing government foreign ministers who lust after getting their shiny bums on UN seats.

How can their visually polluting windmills and sun-dependent solar panels help to solve airliner pollution? Their limited and uneconomic energy cannot be stored as base loads!

Oh yes, I forgot, UN delegates spend most of their time in first class seats.

There was definitely a spring in Julie Bishop’s step when she raced into Abbott’s office to be the first to tell him to pack his stuff… the global warming scam was back on the agenda and the windmills would keep spinning.

No-one questions the fraudulence of the UN’s methods. The IPCC is made up entirely, not of scientists or meteorologists, but of overpaid crooks like chairman Rajendra Pachauri, a scruffy, long-haired, Indian diesel mechanic who resigned after he was found sexually molesting his staff (pictured left).

The IPCC only accepts advice from committed “scientific” warmists. That’s their role. Thus the, “97 percent of scientists agree …” nonsense, while the 33,000 real scientists, who denounce global warming as a hoax, are never heard from!

The UN is proving once again that with constant repetition and weight of money any idiot can be convinced of anything … and if you don’t believe that, consider this:

The World Health Organisation (just another arm of the corrupt UN) now says snags and bacon are carcinogens and equal to cigarettes and asbestos. WTF?

So please explain why anyone (apart from Julie Bishop of course) would believe anything espoused by this corrupt, exploitative UN mob of international criminals.

524
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
279 Comment threads
245 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
113 Comment authors
2bitsmackay50manukaiTonyH1rdoval@gmail.com Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
Notify of
mackay50
Member
mackay50
manukai
Member
manukai

The sooner the UN goes the way of the League of Nations, the better and it wont be soon enough.

TonyH
Member
TonyH

Modern day snake oil salesman.

bayardo
Member
bayardo

It makes me so mad that these con merchants in the UN are fleecing us and we just go along with it with not a whimper. Our pollies should be tried for treason for leading us down this path of self destruction.

bayardo
Member
bayardo

Petrol is $1.07 at my local servo today south of Perth CBD.

Wobblyone
Member
Wobblyone

Thanks for that Larry. Great to be able to get daily confirmation of the garbage being churned out ad nauseum, by the lefty whacko’s who have control of our National Carrier and its brown-nosed commercial media followers.

ApplePie
Member
ApplePie

Has anyone noticed Ted Cruz, the republican candidate hopeful. Now there’s a guy with backbone that they need running the show. He destroys global warming loonys and stuck it up the lefty moderators in the latest Republican Q&A. With a bloke like that in charge there would be no stuffing around with climate loonys, Muslims or any other professional troublemakers.

baseballbob
Member
baseballbob

Yup…no such thing as a tame terrorrist or de-radicalised ‘radical’.

stringybark
Member
stringybark

Again that’s the problem when countries think they can have their “tame’ Islamic terrorists. Like Osama Bin Laden who was a tame American backed terrorist. An Islamic terrorist is a terrorist.

baseballbob
Member
baseballbob

Well…Sinn Fein is now the political wing of the ‘defunct’ IRA?

stringybark
Member
stringybark

And there lies the problem and why America is arming Al-Qaeda (again). Try to find a real spokesman for the Free Syrian Army. Many aren’t Syrians and the officers have mostly deserted to IS. America is again using terrorists to change governments they don’t like. Working a treat.

baseballbob
Member
baseballbob

One man’s terrorist is another man’s ‘freedom fighter.

stringybark
Member
stringybark

As Lavrov said, it walks like a terrorist it fights like a terrorist it’s a terrorist.

baseballbob
Member
baseballbob

So, is Putin hitting the ‘right’ terrorists?

stringybark
Member
stringybark

Pie, the only thing the west is hitting the terrorists with is tons of military supplies the Americans are dropping to them.

ApplePie
Member
ApplePie

The West is toying with the Muslims. When the West is resolved to act the Mus will wonder what hit them. Reminds me of the fish sketch in Monty P.

GeorgeofMagpie
Member
GeorgeofMagpie

That’s ooooh sooo true Goldi ,
There’s something really fishy , and it reeks of refo advocates and lawyers …

Deecee
Guest
Deecee

Yesterday caught some little lovely on an ABC current affairs show about the Australian Economy waffle on knowingly about the complex state of the economy and then referred to the CPI as the “Consumer Price Inflation” I’m sorry but nice boobs does not an intelligent reporter make!

2bits
Member
2bits

Pie.. RE; Rudd over throw speech very good point

ApplePie
Member
ApplePie

W – let’s just simplify it. Karma will catch up with TBull – it’s a matter of time

ApplePie
Member
ApplePie

SBS is full of Amnesty International deriding the Australian Gvmnts ‘Sovereign Borders’ as illegal. I’ll take ‘illegal’ any day over the ‘free for all’ in Europe. ABC/SBS love this stuff.

ApplePie
Member
ApplePie

To demonstrate my point. Look at the speech MT gave deriding the overthrow of Rudd and he proceeds to perform the same low dog act on Abbott, with a lesser justification. Why did the media let this slide?

ApplePie
Member
ApplePie

It wouldn’t matter if it was Godwin Gretch or Bob the Builder. Turnbull made a grave error of judgement in gambling his credibility on the “say so” of an obscure individual. It displays a clear absence of ‘street smarts’ and there is no reason to indicate he has suddenly changed. His involvement in the LoanPos/Finance Now debacle again displays his ability to land himself in the sewer. Abbott leaves this bloke for dead on all fronts except the ‘smarmy factor”.

baseballbob
Member
baseballbob

Turnbull has better connections in the media?? I don’t know…

2bits
Member
2bits

totally agree with many posts above about the non-stop hatred displayed against Abbott even while he is out of the job. The biggest issue haunting Turnbull would be the Godwin Grech affair when he truly had egg all over his face and more… So based on the attacks on Abbott, what aren’t they attacking TURNBULL over Godwin Grech ???

TheDuke
Member
TheDuke

This stinks like an end run around the asylum seeking rules. Everyone knows what this will end up being a court case.

ApplePie
Member
ApplePie

What is often overlooked is that immediately after the narrow 1 vote leadership result, the vote on the ETS was decisive in Abbott’s favour.

ApplePie
Member
ApplePie

Yes Winston – Abbott did the hard yards in the face of unimaginable undermining. Turnbull has bided his time whilst Abbott gained Government and took the flak. I believe Abbott has still has majority support amongst the thinking voters and the injustice done to him will finally dawn on the electorate as Turnbull’s waffle and inaction hits home. It appears Turnbull has lots to say and little resolve. Remind you of Labor qualities? Turnbull will shortly have to get off the fence and make a move one way or the other. It’s only a matter of time.

BillMartin
Member
BillMartin

Einstein is credited with having said that there is a limit to everything except human stupidity. Would have to be one of his most profound utterances.

1 4 5 6