Well, the big guns are lining up to take a shot at our hideous Constitution. This awful document has been protecting the rights of all Australians since Federation. In fact, it has done a better job of protecting us than almost any other Constitution ever written.

Clearly it needs to be tampered with and who better to do the tampering than a bunch of tree hugging propeller heads who probably couldn’t even spell the word “Constitution".

The biggest “gun” of all is the Indigenous Referendum Council Chair, Mark Leibler. Mr Leibler now believes that he can bypass One Nation to push this legislation through the Senate.

All the other parties and independents are apparently itching to chuck our Constitution under a bus. One Nation is still clinging to the outdated notion of “equality” and “rights”

This quaint idea of rights is just so “last century.” It should have been completely eradicated and replaced with the far superior concept of “human rights.”

The wonderful thing about these “human rights” is that they don’t apply to traditional Australians. That is why it is imperative that we shred the Constitution and update it to reflect the new 21st Century paradigm.

Mr Leibler has astutely identified that Aboriginal people have been “completely wiped from the constitution.” It is fortunate we have lawyers of Mr Leibler’s calibre to interpret this document.

Otherwise, laymen like me might think that the Constitution gives Aborigines exactly the same rights and protections as everyone else, regardless of their skin colour or genetic heritage.

The upcoming referendum will seek to upgrade these “rights” to shiny new “human rights”

Once these new “human rights” are enshrined in our new “you beaut” Constitution, lawyers like Mr Liebler will be able to negotiate treaties and compensation for a very reasonable five or six hundred bucks an hour.

Of course, since we are around $500 billion in the hole, we don’t have any money to pay these lawyers' fees, let alone the hefty compensation bill they will be demanding.

Fortunately, I expect Mr Leibler’s friends at National Australia Bank will be happy to print up some more cash to lend us so that we can discharge our obligations (and pay the lawyers too).

The only thing standing in the way of this financial bonanza, are a bunch of right wing Liberal Senators (in case you aren’t with the program yet, right wingers are the bad guys…boooo hiss).

Mr Leibler is hoping to persuade Tony Abbott to use his influence with these "bad Senators" who don’t appear to be ashamed of their skin colour or heritage.

I’m sure Mr Leibler won’t be resting until these evil Senators are brought into line and our Constitution is stripped of its vile institutional racism and equality.

So, who is this wonderful Mr Leibler? This champion of the poor, equality burdened Aborigines. This bane of evil Right Wing Constitutionalists.

Mr Leibler ekes out a living as a tax lawyer. I don’t think he has ever worked for H and R Block however. Mr Leibler interprets tax law for the big end of town. If your bottom line isn’t measured in billions, you probably aren’t one of his clients.

Why do these multinational conglomerates need tax lawyers? Well, they want to ensure that they comply with the letter of the tax code, whilst not, er, “overpaying.” They also need a tax lawyer to help them to boost the economy. The economy of the Cayman Islands that is.

And which community needs those tax dollars more than any other? Well I don’t have any figures, but if you ignore the Lebanese, the Sudanese, the Somalis, the Afghans, the Syrians, the Iraqis and the Iranians, then it is probably the Aboriginal community.

Of course, having such a big heart (as most corporate tax lawyers seem to be burdened with) Mr Leibler is also a great friend of the aforementioned Muslim refugees (or country shoppers, to use the correct legal term). In fact, Mr Leibler is a friend to all refugees from all parts of the world.

When I say “all” refugees, I don’t of course, mean “all refugees.” He is implacably opposed to the resettlement of Palestinian refugees in Israel. That is where Mr Leibler’s “human rights” come to a screeching halt.

Mr Leibler served for 10 years as President of the Zionist Federation of Australia. He also served for six years as President of the United Israel Appeal of Australia and countless other Jewish organisations as well.

Zionism is the belief in a nationalistic ethno-religious Jewish state in Israel. I personally have no problem with this stance. I sympathise with those Arabs who were displaced 70 years ago. However, I don’t believe that redrawing borders and handing out compensation to people on the basis of what (in most cases) happened to their parents or grandparents.

I particularly understand that the Muslims have an agenda with relation to Israel. That agenda has nothing to do with a two-state solution and everything to do with “wiping Israel off the map.”

I think that Israelis are wise to keep their nation for the most part, ethnically, religiously and culturally homogenous. I also think that Australians would be wise to keep their nation for the most part, ethnically, religiously and culturally homogenous.

It is a well-documented and rather obvious fact, that such nations are the most secure and peaceful kind of societies. Australia was a standout example of this fact, in the days before it was hoodwinked into the doctrine of multiculturalism.

I know there are many people who will disagree with my stance but at least I am consistent. Mr Leibler’s stance is one of stark hypocrisy. He admits to opposing One Nation’s policies on Islamic immigration into Australia. He would however be fully on board with One Nation’s support for no Islamic immigration into Israel.

The agenda of people like Mr Leibler may be couched in fancy sounding terms like tolerance, diversity or multiculturalism. When you drill down however, these policies are simply a thinly veiled attack on the traditional, Christian, English speaking people who built this nation and still constitute a majority of its inhabitants.

Tolerance means tolerating destructive, non-Australian, cultures. Diversity means having less traditional Aussies and multiculturalism means having less traditional Australian culture (or even denying that Australia has a traditional culture).

What leading members of the Jewish community hope to achieve by this is a mystery to me. Prioritising the rights of Aboriginal people in the Constitution and then transferring large sums of money to them (which will undoubtedly be the next step) will do nothing to help Aborigines with their most pressing problems.

These include unemployment, alcoholism, drug abuse, child neglect, child abuse, domestic violence, interethnic violence, sexual abuse, gambling, and low school attendance to name but a few. If anyone thinks that giving Aboriginal people more money will reduce any of those problems then they are a naïve fool. Mr Leibler doesn’t strike me as a naïve fool.

Many Australians are now starting to suspect that these actions by leading Jewish figures are a direct attack on the traditional Australian people. 18C was another issue which was introduced largely with Jewish backing. The Jewish lobby also fought ferociously to ensure that the Liberals have never been able to repeal this legislation.

In effect, Jewish organisations have been at the forefront of a movement to deny Australians the right to free speech. A right which our forefathers fought and died for.

This is not something that sits well with traditional Australians. Not surpisingly, anti-Semitism is on the rise because sadly, people will tend to blame all Jews.

Jewish friends tell me that Mark Leibler is not elected and not representative of the whole Jewish community. However, Australians need to hear from the Jewish community condemning this behaviour. So far there has been an almost universal silence.

One exception has been Avi Yemini. He has been active in condemning Islamic immigration and that is to be applauded. However, many will see that as simply looking after Jewish self-interest. Australians need to see more.

Australians need to see the Jewish community speaking out against multiculturalism, diversity, bogus human rights and all the other attacks on traditional Australians. If they don’t, then it is almost a certainty that hostility towards the Jewish community will increase.

That is not good for any of us. The Jewish community is extraordinarily productive in a wide variety of fields. They create wealth and value which enriches all Australians and not just economically.

For Jews to attack the power of the traditional people of the Anglosphere seems stupid in the extreme. Jews have never been treated as well by any other group of people. The UK had a Jewish Prime Minister when Jews were facing Pogroms in Russian and dhimmitude in the Islamic world.

Jews flocked to the USA, the UK, Australia and Canada to escape persecution in the rest of the World. Jews have never been persecuted in the English-speaking world since they arrived in the time of Cromwell. They have thrived here like nowhere else.

The countries of the English-speaking world have also been among the staunchest supporters of Israel’s right to exist. So why try to disempower traditional Aussies in their own country? Why try to vandalise our constitution to disenfranchise traditional Australians on racial grounds?

If the Jewish community don’t start speaking out soon then the situation will go downhill rapidly. Anti-Semitism is guaranteed to rise. This will be driven in part from the “new Australians” that Jewish leaders seem so keen to import. It will also be driven by resentment of traditional Australians who will increasingly view Jews as hostile to their very existence.

It is a lose-lose for both Jewish and non-Jewish Australians and people as intelligent as Mark Leibler should know better.

1282
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
726 Comment threads
556 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
127 Comment authors
ozboyIslanderHappy42Pablo1rdoval@gmail.com Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
Notify of
Happy42
Member
Happy42

In the Lower House, because of preferential voting, you always end up voting for either of the major parties except in the rare cases where a minor party candidate can pull enough primary numbers to gain the seat. Have we reached the stage where it’s time to either cop the fine or stage a massive “None of the Above” informal vote in the House of Reps and save our real vote for the Senate, where you can actually vote for whom you want by voting below the line? I definitely don’t want to see Labor win in 2019, but neither… Read more »

Pablo
Member
Pablo

.Islam had, and has, NO place in Australia and it’s Western Culture and Values..Australia does not need a Terror Infused Cult infecting all that we Stand For and Love about OUR Country….

TonyH
Member
TonyH

Looks like we got orphaned.!

TonyH
Member
TonyH

It’s not freedom speech as far as Joyce is concerned, it is a form of abuse of power. Using his position to influence the opinions if others especially employees making them wear Gsy rings and items which identify as support for a political,position and discriminating against those in the work place who do not conform is an offence in this country. Some one would do well to remind Joyce.

Sweetpea
Member
Sweetpea

Our old bull ended up at the abattoirs, pity they didn’t have little blue pills for ‘Walter’.

Sweetpea
Member
Sweetpea

Not to mention the thousands of women raped by the Russians – friend of mine as a little boy had a Russian gun put to his head whilst his mother was raped.

ejada
Donor
ejada

Very interesting that Keating has come out and said the top tax rate should be no higher than 39%. Obviously Paul does not want to pay the 49.5% top tax rate he can see coming under a Shorten Labor government. I bet neither does Bill Ludwig and his union cronies.

pod8
Member
pod8

Have one of the biggest Red pills ever (scroll down for videos):
http://thegreateststorynevertold.tv

pelican
Member
pelican

yes saddler…but again., who’ is to say that its not just a complimentary nickname…

Pablo
Member
Pablo

Raising our taxes to pay for it all…I wish they could all TAX their own Conscious and Wallet before asking for me to have a say in it all.

Bottle
Member
Bottle

Yeah they recognise them locally here as well…fact is though….If you have a quick look around the room….none of the bastards are even present………

stringybark
Member
stringybark

Take a long lie down funk you need it

stringybark
Member
stringybark

So the Red Army liberated the concentration camps, drove the Germans out and put a government of Polish communists in power. Only the craziest right winger or neo nazi would equate the Polish communist government with German occupation. Which means funk and the Israeli who doesn’t realise who freed his people from the camps.

stringybark
Member
stringybark

So you think Poland preferred to be under German rule? Who liberated the concentration camps in Poland – Auschwitz -Birkenau, Maidenak, Treblinka and others – not your Americans or British but the Red Army. You really are ignorant right wind loons if you don’t understand that. Cranky old bastards. Putin is proud of the Red Army liberating Poland. Read something else except right wing nutters weekly.

TonyH
Member
TonyH

Another thing Abbott was correct on, he refused to bail out Qantas who went on to record a massive profit, the same as the car manufacturers.

chrisk
Donor
chrisk

lg … we could even send her parliamentary pension to her there, as long as she promised not to come back.

1rdoval@gmail.com
Member
1rdoval@gmail.com

Sticky would make a good ambassador to North Korea, Chris. Better than having her rattling around here.

Lookdeeper
Member
Lookdeeper

You are no doubt aware that the Maria Wilson has mental health problems. Anyway, one of the victims is outraged that mental health is being used as an excuse by a white person for the assault. She has a lot of Muslim supporters with her outrage. They don’t like it when the boot is on the other foot as to mentally ill people and race hate crimes. Maybe if these race hate crimes and Islamic terrorists attacks didn’t happen and as a consequence there would be no publicity, these nut jobs wouldn’t be doing what they are doing. The power… Read more »

stringybark
Member
stringybark

There was deep bitterness between the Polish officer class and the Red Army after 20,000 Soviet POW’s died in Polish hands in 1921. It certainly set the mood for the execution of 8000 Polish officers in 1940. There is a million page archive on that, with Russian government files opened during the 1990’s.

mots
Member
mots

Ha ha good one Radar.

stringybark
Member
stringybark

The area they occupied was part of the old Russian Empire that had been lost at Brest Litovsk. They had unsuccessfully tried to retake it in 1920. It is now part of Ukraine. But they liberated all of Poland from the Germans in 1944.

chrisk
Donor
chrisk

Maybe we could send him Julie Bishop as well so he could have a variety

chrisk
Donor
chrisk

lg …. certainly take the point off his head. 🙂

1rdoval@gmail.com
Member
1rdoval@gmail.com

Could only improve his looks, Chris . . .

chrisk
Donor
chrisk

R and H02 … she may have threatened to go to NK and sit on his face.

Rule7.62
Member
Rule7.62

They took over, as in invaded, the east side when the Germans came in from the west.

1 13 14 15