In the eyes and minds of many Australians, the 7th of December 2017 should become known as the day Australia lost an essential part of its unique character and perspective on life – its fair go and egalitarian attitude towards all. It is also the day from which many Australians will recognise that politicians have no regard for the majority of hard working people living and working and paying taxes in this country. 

After watching the unashamed display put on by politicians in parliament house on that day, there is little doubt that apart from the YES lobby and their misguided supporters, many Australians witnessed blatant arrogance and insensitive exuberance displayed towards the rest of the country. Only 4 out of 150 politicians (2.6%) revealed the courage and the deference to support the 40% of voters who voted NO.

[Thought: With so many local councils wanting to remove Australia day from the 26th of January, it might be appropriate to start referring to the 7th of December as unAustralia day?]

Once the so-called debate on SSM / equality was over and Australia's charlatan politicians jubilantly amended the marriage laws, many YES devotees celebrated their ‘win’ in the belief that waves of euphoric love would spread across the country transforming it into a paradise kingdom of joy and harmony and unbridled enlightenment.

Unfortunately and sadly, there were YES supporters who secretly would have preferred to be NO supporters and either assumed the outcome would be an inevitable YES or did not want to face the pressures of the political correction brigade. Either way, they voted YES so they could be seen to support the ideals of equal rights and get back to their lives without further unwanted interruption.

The remaining YES supporters believed they were endorsing the progressive ideal of establishing the same rights for all Australians. Mantras of equality for all; equal marriage; same sex marriage were mindlessly repeated in blissful ignorance of having been used in a classic Machiavellian move. Such high ideals appealed to many voters and were so effective in their influence that the outcome of the postal survey was decided in the first week, well before the debate commenced. At the very least, the majority of the 60% who selected YES naively believed that equity and fairness were the prime motivations for giving their support.

Regardless of the reasons 60% chose YES, their wishful thinking will not last long as more and more Australians realise that the opposite is not only to be the new reality, but the reality that was intended all along. In place of a kingdom of glorious love and equality for all, the citizens of Australia will gradually recognise the need to defend themselves against a deluge of coercive moves and underhanded tactics driven by a single goal – to impose acquiescence to the eventual collapse of western culture as we have known it. 

The mantras were simply a euphoric distraction and it is now the time to punish the regressive 40%.

Behind the scenes sat an unforeseen coalition of groups that were not prominent during the survey and silently allowed the popular notion of ‘equality for all’ to spearhead the preordained result. All the while these groups harboured another, far more malicious, destructive, and longstanding agenda in readiness for an expected clear-cut YES result.

There are many labels and actions that apply to such groups. Some include: leftists, socialists, marxists, communists, Labor, Greens, Fabians, liberalists, anti-facists / anti-racists / anti-bullies, safe schools, feminists, and political correction / thought police. The list goes on. Together they constitute a broad coalition of left-leaning groups and individuals known as the Left Unity. All are founded on communist ideals and actively promote the acceptance of socialism for Australia.

Officially, such groups include: Australian Greens; Australian Labor Party; Communist Party of Australia (Marxist–Leninist – also established and financed the Search Foundation); Getup (supports and promotes Labor and Greens' agenda); Socialist Alliance (the university student network); Socialist Alternative; Socialist Equality Party; Socialist Party; Solidarity; and Workers' Liberty Australia. Again the list goes on. The Communist Party maintains a "Roadmap to the Left" that lists political parties, organisations, and media outlets committed to developing a "comprehensive alternative to neo-liberal capitalism". Regardless of their labels, or who the individuals are, or the groups they are affiliated with, all share a common mindset: socialism or more accurately, a neo-Marxist / cultural Marxist doctrine.

Tracing back through the history of leftist thinking to determine the roots of cultural Marxism is not a simple task. Even learned experts do not agree on what gave rise to the ideals and agendas of the current doctrine. In reading through the mountain of articles available online, the only consistent pattern that emerges is the backgrounds and biases of the authors. That is, their position on the political spectrum determines whether cultural Marxism is accepted as valid (a right wing claim) or a fabrication / right wing conspiracy (a left wing claim). The left denies the existence of cultural Marxism, the right see it as the root of all evils in the Western world.

                                                          50 shades of gay

Several names and organisations stand out over the course of the decades since the Communist Revolution: Marx of course, Antonio Gramsci (Italian Marxist – The Prison Notebooks and Cultural hegemony), Georg Lukács (cultural terrorism), Felix Weil (funded a new Marxist Institute for Social Research, which later became the Frankfurt School), Columbia University (published works on Critical Theory), Theodor Adorno (Frankfurt School – redefined views on gender roles and sexual mores as prejudice), Max Horkheimer (Frankfurt School – essay titled Traditional and Critical Theory: Critical Theory), Herbert Marcuse (Frankfurt School – Eros and Civilization), and Rudi Dutschke (the long march through the institutions).

The above names and their key works are briefly listed in case anyone wants to look into each in more detail. The complete list is far longer. The point made here is that a long line of Marxist related thinking culminated in the 1960’s and has continued to influence our lives and events to this day.

The social / cultural revolution of the 1960s rapidly opened the door to a range of liberations: black power, feminism, gay rights, sexual freedom, and the anti-establishment movement. 

These ideals and actions were consistent with the principles that were articulated by the earlier Marxist proponents. Since the 60s, we have witnessed the disturbing effects of multiculturalism, the family court, racial tensions, anti-discrimination laws, political correctness, an inconsistent legal system, media bias, information control, government propaganda and lies, the rewriting of history, the erosion of basic rights and free speech, gender dysphoria and fluidity, and the effects of postmodernism (relative thinking) and its offshoots, Critical Theory, Cultural Studies, Feminist Theory, and Gender Studies.

In all likelihood, none of the Left Unity groups will agree or admit to the existence of cultural Marxism, or the Frankfurt School, or even the broader Marxist influences that have emerged over the past 100 years. Clearly the influences evolved over a long period of time and as yet have not been consolidated into an agreed field of thought or doctrine. Perhaps they simply do not want to. However, in the absence of an outright acknowledgement, it is difficult to establish the exact nature of the Left Unity’s common roots. What is obvious is that all share the ideals of cultural Marxism regardless of whether or not they exist or are officially acknowledged by the individual groups.

                                          The Frankfurt School of Marxism

Although many writers claim the Frankfurt School produced a list of 11 recommendations (an 11 step plan of cultural subversion) for the systematic corruption of western culture, it simply is not possible to directly attribute the list to the school or any of its members. A more plausible explanation is that the list could have been compiled from previous Marxist works.

Therefore, rather than get caught up in proving if the Frankfurt school produced this list, it is more productive to read though the recommendations and ask whether or not examples of each can be confirmed. Then, ask why such a list exists at all – where could it have come from given that present day examples abound for each and every recommendation. 

On completing this exercise, it will be difficult to deny the conclusion that the 11 recommendations neatly summarise how to undermine the foundations of our society and bring about the type of dystopia we now see throughout Australia every day:

  1. Establish wide ranging racism offences and hate speech laws.
  2. Generate continual change to cause confusion.
  3. Introduce sexual propaganda in schools and expose children to pornography to encourage acceptance and desire for homosexualisation.
  4. Undermine and remove parental and teachers’ authority.
  5. Use immigration to destroy national identity and provoke racial tension.
  6. Enable excessive use of alcoholic drink and recreational drugs.
  7. Establish sexual deviance as a norm in society.
  8. Create an unreliable legal system with bias against the victims of crime (trauma through injustice).
  9. Induce dependency on state benefits.
  10. Control and dumb down all media. (Six companies now control 96 percent of the world’s media).
  11. Breakdown the family unit.

As mentioned, members of the Frankfurt School did publish works on Critical Theory. The basic principles have now evolved into a field of study known by the same seemingly innocuous title that instructs students on the destructive criticism of Western culture. The education system has become the vehicle to gradually erode Christian values and morality and instil in students a mindset of continual criticism of all aspects of Western culture over time. In essence, Critical Theory is another strategy for undermining and eventually destroying Christianity, capitalism, authority, the family, patriarchy, morality, tradition, sexual restraint, loyalty, patriotism, nationalism, heredity, ethno-centrism, and conservatism. Critical Theory is underscored by a deep seated belief in the pervasiveness of Western evils: racism, sexism, colonialism, nationalism, homophobia, fascism, xenophobia, imperialism, white supremacy, and religious bigotry (applied only to Christianity).

In addition to a decades long presence of the Socialist Alliance network within Australian Universities, many, if not all universities, particularly the G8 group, cannot be viewed as anything other than leftist. Much of the content, the nature of the subjects, their academics, and the students themselves observe a highly progressive left-wing bias. All teach subjects and courses that cover one or more of the critical theory related topics listed beforehand. This is a form of mind programming that is made even more potent due to the overrepresentation of feminist devotees and feminism studies in universities.

Is anyone still wondering why 60% of voters supported the YES position and why the greater proportion of YES voters was aged less than 30 years? This article has only scratched the surface of how far leftist ideology has taken root within Australia. In light of the outcome of the SSM survey, it is also clear that their influence has spread far wider and deeper than most have imagined. 

This leaves us with one more question to ponder. On the 7th of /December 2017, were the politicians celebrating a win for SSM or the triumph of ‘cultural Marxism’ in Australia?

 

 

1597
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
827 Comment threads
770 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
137 Comment authors
barraabuspheasantpluckerJetstarpelicanbolll47 Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
Notify of
barraabus
Member
barraabus

Why does Australia have nothing but idiots in it’s parliament?

pheasantplucker
Member
pheasantplucker

Tigertwat, you and that dickhead Blount are a pair of fairy fucking trolls. Would not surprise if you were the same faggott.

Jetstar
Member
Jetstar

The other question is, who is it for Soros to interfere with national sovereignty issues? The guy should be executed for sedition and treason.

Jetstar
Member
Jetstar

“Victim of Psychopathy”. Or are they? It’s worked quite well for them over the millenia as a group. A psychopathy of supremacy, paranoia and projection.

Jetstar
Member
Jetstar

The toasted cars need to be explained Dusty. I’ve seen the same thing in different parts of the world with bushfires. Metal panels don’t buckle in normal fires. Getting back to McGee, she uses some sexual undertones (body language) in some videos if you ask me. That’s what made me a little suspicious. I trust Bollyn as one of the best researchers, however what I see with most people is they place themselves in one camp and are too inflexible to accept a dithered position. A true scientist will always keep uncertainty on board. I think a lot of people… Read more »

pelican
Member
pelican

MM..its just plain vicious…and the way they play dumbass Conservatives like violins is just scary…

Jetstar
Member
Jetstar

That’s it Chop. The Truth is anti-Semitic.

Same again with the slave trade. Jews bragged about it at the time that they were the number one slave traders of the world. That they made huge fortunes from it.

Now it’s all whiteys fault. May God curse them and give them purple skin. Then we can see what these fuckers are up to instead of sneakingly off loading their immorality on whites.

Jetstar
Member
Jetstar

Yes pelican. When you really know what is going on, you know who are really spilling the beans and who are not.

To some people the interview may not mean much. To me, I was saying WTF many times when I first heard this. I though this McDonald guy really knows what is going on intimately and they are going to rub him out. I remember the downing of flight 007, but I had not realised McDonald was on the flight until I watched this interview.

Then I though, so typical.

pelican
Member
pelican

Pat Buchanan got it right, when he said at one end we have the communists and the other end of the same group we have Haig..is that the conspiracy..no Pat thats the reality..they are all on the same team run by the same Controllers

pelican
Member
pelican

‘Congressman Larry McDonald on Crossfire, May 1983, just three months before being killed in the Korean Airlines 747 that was shot down by the Soviets near Moneron Island after the plane entered Soviet airspace.’..how convenient……..’Braden’s efforts were guided toward promoting anti-Soviet left-wing elements in groups such as the AFL-CIO. Eventually, despite heavy resistance from British and French allies, the CIA made the leap toward recruiting disaffected anti-Soviet ex-communists, especially in the international labor unions.’ and we know what this means, just look at him ‘Braden was reported to be an integral part in Operation Mockingbird, the CIA’s effort in the… Read more »

Jetstar
Member
Jetstar

dusty, there is not much you can put up on 9/11 I haven’t already seen. All these MSM and talking heads are members of the CFR (did you hear Dan Rather’s name come up?). CFR links back to Rockefellers. Rockefellers link back to Rothschilds in the main and a few other Jewish banking families. CIA, MI6, Mossad, KGB all tie back to the City of London and the Rothschilds. This is what they do when you spill the beans on the guys running the show. Relative of Patton, you know what they did to him – Patton. This guy had… Read more »

Jetstar
Member
Jetstar

Seems like you are an “either or” type of thinker dusty.

Life is never so simple.

Jetstar
Member
Jetstar

Thanks for confirming you are a true follower of The Synagogue of Satan.

Still waiting for that correction on Goebbels and quote attributed to Hitler when he was attributing it to the Jews.

Mr spreader of lies and deceit.

Jetstar
Member
Jetstar

What’s the official version of 9/11, the 9/11 Commission report?

I can’t understand from your reply where you crossover from McGee to Wood.

Yes, McGee comes over as too well resourced. But I haven’t faulted her on anything much yet. McGee is correct on the illuminaughty influence. She even names Jews indirectly in her comments.

Julian Assange is deep state too, but I know his angle.

So what is Wood’s or McGee’s angle? Can you explain the toasted cars?

What put’s me off about McGee is she uses some symbolism. Did you pick it?

Jetstar
Member
Jetstar

Oh, the sweet rabbi is quoting fakipedia. Hey you lying cunt, when are you going to spread the lies about Goebbels again? I’m still waiting for you to bring the original source evidence where he said it. Think about this, antisemtism is the universal constant wherever Jews go. But it’s never Jews, it’s every one else. Every country they have been kicked out of, every monarch that has put special laws on them, everyone else is wrong and Jews have always been the victims. This story sounds very familiar with the story of Islam. It’s the law of inversion when… Read more »

Jetstar
Member
Jetstar

Fuck she is good Dusty. I hadn’t seen that video.

Jetstar
Member
Jetstar

Again Disraeli, you lying, scheming, low life cunt. Where is Goebbels’s quote verified? I gave it to you what he said already. On your latest strawman you just summed yourself up brilliantly with your own reference. You don’t even read the work you post and again you second source, Wikipedia, however on this occasion they do get the quote correct. The Big lie was attributed to the Jews and never discussed as a propaganda technique to use for propaganda purposes. If you bothered to read a book in your lifetime you may learn something. I have read Mein Kampf, I… Read more »

Jetstar
Member
Jetstar

That’s it Rinaldo. Could very well be NYC.

Jetstar
Member
Jetstar

Dusty, she exposes too much of the inside stuff to be a disinfo agent. Now Alex Jones or Paul Joseph Watson are obvious. But I am having trouble finding a chink in her armor.

Why vacillate over whether is has to be an either or with Israel or a DEW. It was most likely both.

Jetstar
Member
Jetstar

comprehension is irrelevant to the lie you propagated. I’m still waiting for you to confirm the Goebbels quote attributed to him. You can’t because he never said it.

You are a typical Jew. A liar.

Jetstar
Member
Jetstar

Nope Dusty, she names them in other videos. She knows.

pelican
Member
pelican

MM..yes, hard to argue with that

Jetstar
Member
Jetstar

pelican, I’ve spoken to a quite a few of the nut jobs on forums. Trust me there a lot of them around. Then again you can see street interviews of everyday Israelis and many of them are just ordinary well balanced people.

Those nut jobs however are putting all sorts of rubbish in movies and music.

Jetstar
Member
Jetstar

Thanks Rinaldo. I am copying and saving a lot of what you put up here. I post it on other forums from time to time.

What I was more interested in was the prophecy of the aliyah, holocaust and apocalypse.

pelican
Member
pelican

thanks MM..interesting vid… Emergency number memorial day !!WTF…and the two towers on the back cover…lol unreal

bolll47
Member
bolll47

To all who see Australia Day 26 January as offensive, especially the Aboriginal brigade who term the day as Invasion day, read the article on the following link, and consider the alternative scenario – no native title! https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/comment-inconvenient-fact-native-title-can-only-exist-if-australia-was-settled-not-invaded/ar-AAuUT3k?ocid=spartandhp

Rule7.62
Member
Rule7.62

He is a white yella fella.

1 15 16 17