The Attorneys General of 50 States and Territories file antitrust action against Google and its parent company, Alphabet, to bypass feckless Feds

The European Union hit GOOGLE with fines of over $8 billion in the last two years.

Like Jabba the Hut being slapped by his pet Antifa dancer, the company just gave a grunt.  There was no noticeable change in corporate value and certainly no change in its admitted misconduct. Same ole stuff, different day.

And the hapless Department of Justice which refuses to do anything even about a presidential coup by the CIA, FBI, NSA and other rogues, would do the same as the EU—they’d just go for the bucks to pad their own coffers and leave the criminals doing what they do, over and over.

Ooh!  That hurt so good my little bad one!  Hit harder so I can feel it!

I live in Europe and reluctantly use Google every day, so I know simple fines did no good against this behemoth. Only carving off body parts will.

As example of what they’re doing, go to Google and partially type in the hottest conservative name in America, James O’Kee[fe]. He’s the guy who got Google insiders on tape and released a trove of internal docs proving intentional manipulation of elections in favour of Democrats in 2016 and 2018—after those same company execs testified under oath to Congress that they had not.

James was invited to the White House and honoured by President Trump He’s known to, and by, every Conservative in America—yet he’s invisible to Google. Just watch as the autofill prompt switches his name to a cardiologist, an O’Connor and six Kennedys. James O’Keefe hardly exists in Google World, by intent.  They don’t want anyone to know about him. This is Search Engine Manipulation Effect. During the time it takes to find James, you’re sidetracked or forgot what you were looking for—or why. That’s intentional.

Now type in one of CNN’s lowest rated Leftist chinwags, Rachel Madd[ow].  The results are all in her name, and they’re positives—even repeated. Rachel Maddow show, YouTube, podcast, ratings (well maybe this one isn’t so positive), twitter, salary, partner, blog and a repeat “show” with YouTube added.

Biased? You bet. So how is this case filed by 50 State and Territory Attorneys General going to be any different than a federal case?

First of all, it’s 50 separate governments, rather than one that has proven itself to be so easily manipulated. For example – six Google officials headed departments for Obama and protected the company from any investigation or harm. 

Graft and corruption work. Just ask Hillary Clinton, James Comey, John Brennan, James Clapper and a dozen other members of the coup who are still walking the streets unindicted, years after their crimes were committed.

But it is now clear that if The Google Gang manipulate the election results next year— as they were allowed to do in 2016 and 201— a Democrat will be elected to the White House—no matter how crazy that candidate proves to be—and any federal investigation will disappear faster than tax dollars on K Street.  A State case, on the other hand, will not.  It will keep on going no matter who’s in the Oval Office.

Keeping an important case like this out of Washington, D.C. was very, very clever.  But to keep Editor Harry happy, I now have to back up what I just wrote about election tampering in 2016 and 2018, don’t I?

OK, Harry, here goes!

Dr. Robert Epstein—a self-described ‘left of left-centre’ Democrat—has proven that Google’s manipulated algorithms in the 2016 presidential election drove a minimum of 2.6 million votes to Hillary Clinton.  Dr. Epstein further admitted that the number might have been much higher.

Under America’s Electoral College system where each State chooses its president, this is a huge deal.  As example, President Trump won the State of Michigan by only 13,107 votes. If Hillary had paid even one visit near the end of her campaign, Google could have easily put her over the top through the Search Engine Manipulation Effect as potential voters did searches. Fortunately, she so despised ‘deplorable’ that she stayed with her own ilk and element in New York and California, losing to Trump.

When asked by Sen. Ted Cruz in his testimony why an admitted left-of-left Hillary voter was bringing forth all of this evidence, Dr. Epstein admirably stated, “I value my country and democracy more that I value any party or candidate. That is why I’m speaking out today.”

This man is a Harvard PhD with the American Institute for Behavioural Research and Technology and has 40 years’ experience in his field.

But if that’s not enough for Editor Harry and the doubters, then you can watch Google Executives admit on film that they intentionally did this as a matter of company policy. James O’Keefe’s investigative group (Project Veritas) filmed them saying so. [In full disclosure, I am financially involved with Project Veritas and James as a supporter]

If that’s not enough for doubtful readers (or Editor Harry), watch this one. If you’re in a hurry, forward to 13:10 where Executive “Head of Responsible Innovation,” Gen Gennai, tells Project Veritas exactly how Google did it—and that they are going to do it again!

OK, so they admit doing it, but Trump won. So, where’s the big deal?

All right, I’ll give you that one—but according to former Secret Service agent, Dan Bongino (who served in Obama’s White House) Google was so sure of their 2016 candidate, Hillary Clinton, winning that they were not aggressive at all.  Google itself predicted that Hillary would win by 92% and as the single largest donor to her campaign, they were cocksure they were going to get what they paid for—both before and after the election.

But what about the 2018 midterm elections?

Different story altogether. 2016 woke Google up and they went full bore in the 2018 midterms. Dr. Epstein’s research has proven that by using ‘SEME’ (Search Engine Manipulation Effect) programmed into Google’s search engine algorithms, “there can be up to an 80% shift as people blindly trust higher ranked search results.” Dr. Epstein added that “these manipulations are invisible and non-competitive,” but “may have shifted 78.2 million results in 2018 across many U.S. races.”

80% of 78.2 million is 62.56 million likely voters, which is massive, even when spread out among Dem voters and candidates in all 50 states.  Is it any wonder the Democrats won the House of Representatives in 2018?  No, it is not.  Google handed them a minimum of 25 seats—and the majority.

But what about the big one in 2020 that will decide the fate of America?

“That these companies all support the same candidate, they will have the power to shift 15 million voters to that candidate.” Dr. Robert Epstein

Dr. Epstein went on to say, “To let Big Tech get away with subliminal manipulation on this scale would be to make the free and fair election meaningless.”

Keeping in mind that the two largest presidential margins in U.S. history were 18 million (Nixon) and 16.8 million (Reagan), a 15 million gain through  fraudulent and ‘invisible’ manipulation—tantamount to advertising by Google ,would likely be the death of America as we know it. If these 50 Attorneys General hadn’t fired the first shot, we’d have been inundated.

Yeah.  50 to 1 is a lot better odds. Smoke ‘em if you got ‘em boys (and girls).  Looks like it’s going down. We gotta win this one for the Trumpster.

I say better to draw down on Google and bust ‘em up—before they destroy us and our way of life.

Must admit, dear Readers, that I did not see this one coming.

I’ve been actively writing about all of this usurpation of State powers by the Feds since September of 1977 and am disgusted by it.

For half a century the States have been asleep, allowing Washington to order them to pay for unfunded mandates passed by Congress using their own revenues, seizing control of education for brainwashing purposes— an area specifically under state management—and in general, handing over their Constitutional powers to an illegally self-empowered federal mob—without as much as a whimper.

So, it gives me great hope that the States are reasserting themselves as the true building blocks of government—and I hope you see it soon Down Under soon as well. 

Time for these tinhorn city tyrants to go—and take their Silicon Valley wine bar friends with ‘em.

If you need us, we’ll be in the saloon havin’ a whiskey, waiting for the shootout.

Howell Woltz

The International Centre for Justice

Warsaw, Poland

Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
160 Comment threads
517 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
84 Comment authors
RinaldoDavid of SydneyHunter02codsyRichard.oz Recent comment authors
Notify of

‘We are moving into a new, controlled society worse than old totalitarianism’ – Zizek on Google leak Modern censorship is more dangerous than open totalitarianism, it being concealed and incorporated in our daily routine, says Slovenian philosopher Slavoj Zizek, commenting on the insider leak detailing Google’s news blacklist. The intellectual told RT he’s not advocating for online anarchy, comparing it to snuff movies in hardcore pornography – some regulation should be in place to block harmful content on the internet, he says. But hiding political motives for suppressing voices online is what worries Zizek the most. “We all know we… Read more »

King of Hearts
King of Hearts

🏠 …. NEW ARTICLE by Harry …. 🏠


The Equation That Explains Evil How good intentions can lead to the impoverishment and murder of millions. September 17, 2019 Dennis Prager Our age loves scientific equations. Here’s one you weren’t taught at college but which affects you as much as the law of gravity: GI – W = E Good Intentions (GI) minus Wisdom (W) leads to Evil (E). You weren’t taught this rule at college because the modern university believes only science has rules. “Rules of life” is another term for wisdom, and there is no wisdom — or even pursuit of wisdom — at our universities. Life… Read more »


‘Climate Change’: A Leftist Excuse to Redistribute Wealth and Destroy the West By Ferdinand Bardamu The “Church of Climate Change” demands that Western nations impose restrictions on industrial CO2 emissions, encouraging them to squander billions on unreliable “green” technologies and renewable sources of energy. They continue to ignore the one policy that has significantly increased atmospheric CO2 levels in the last few decades, generating hundreds of millions of metric tons of the stuff annually: mass third-world immigration (see Kolankiewicz and Camarota, 2008). If the IPCC were objective, it would demand an end to mass immigration instead of more carbon taxes… Read more »

sideways G
sideways G

Soooooooo sad! The Mail Online doesn’t seem to have gotten the message that the 3 day cycle has passed. Still trying to save the Bileola Tamils .. at least the comments are getting it right .. everyone is getting fed-up with these spongers.


Cashless Society and the End of Freedom In 1971, US researchers sought to create a perfect surveillance system that wouldn’t inhibit people’s behavior. They predicted that the widespread adoption of debit cards would eventually become that surveillance system and they were right. The surveillance capability introduced by debit cards diminishes the anonymity of cash payments, making it easier for the government to collect taxes and eliminate black markets that heavily rely on cash precisely for its untraceability. Australia has the world’s highest cigarette tax, which has precipitated a massive black market, which the Australian government decided to deal with by… Read more »


The buck toothed cretin running New Zealand has banned firearms under pain of 5 years in jail, but is doing a Gladys in making murder of babies legal up until the moment of birth. Of course only whites will hand in their guns, not the moslems, which is the intention. She should be at home feeding the chooks.

“The time is right’: New Zealand’s parliament advances bill that would decriminalize abortion

On the campaign trail two years ago, New Zealand’s future prime minister Jacinda Ardern promised voters that if her party took the majority, she would prioritize decriminalizing abortion.”

King of Hearts
King of Hearts


An interesting article about Facebook’s Face Surveillance …

.. Facebook using and sharing “facial recognition templates” of users …


Following a ban on virtually all semi-automatic firearms, New Zealanders face 5 years in jail if they refuse to hand them in.

King of Hearts
King of Hearts

Photoshopped ?

No .. real.

For cat lovers …

comment image