For some time now, we have been told that climate change is a clear and present danger and that we must act right now, or extinction of the human race will occur within a very short period of time.

Not might occur, mind you. Will occur. Proponents of this argument are in absolutely no doubt that this imminent catastrophe has been brought about by human activity. This is, of course, pure bunkum.


Some of the more extreme opinions in this area suggest we are heading for disaster in the next two or three years. The end is nigh.

If that occurs, the recent proclamation from the Greens makes an interesting challenge. They will use, and you’ll excuse the pun, whatever power they may have to ensure we have a 100% renewable power supply and a halt to thermal coal exports by 2030.

If their dire predictions are right, I’m not sure how that will occur as we will have all ceased to exist eight years prior.


There have been countless not-negotiable deadlines imposed on humanity over time and very few, if any, have actually come to pass.

Peak oil is a great example. Doomsday forecasters suggested that in the 1970’s, the world would reach a point where the availability of crude oil would peak and then diminish rapidly as it is a finite resource.

Increasing human consumption coupled with geological scarcity would drive prices to unaffordable levels before the whole supply finally tapped out thus bringing planet Earth to her knees.

When it did not happen, the scientific argument switched to peak oil demand. We are still waiting for that, but fingers are resting on panic buttons to be sure.


Certainly, the numerous “end of days” predictions over the years have never proven true. Last time I checked; we are still here.

In these critical times, we must immediately mend our ways, we are told. Stop mining and burning coal, they shout. Stop eating meat, kill all cows, sheep, goats, etc and switch to a plant-based diet.

Construct more of those bird-slaughtering wind powered turbines and install more and more solar panels. Oh, and smite the unbelievers while you’re at it. Glue yourself to a road to prove your point.

Better still, strip down to your underwear and parade about shouting slogans and holding up banners displaying a symbol which is curiously reminiscent of a swastika.

Makes you think, doesn’t it? What could possibly justify such demands and behaviours?

The science! Actually, I’ve left out a very important adjective there. The settled science. The type of science where no further science is required.

Peak oil science. The type of science that cannot and must not be argued against. The type of science that outweighs every counter argument and for which no amount of contrary evidence can be offered.

The type of science that employs thousands and thousands globally who continually investigate matters which, according to many, are already settled.
The type of science that is actually the antithesis of science.

For those that argue in favour of man-made climate change, the science is now at a point – and has been for a long time – where the theory is proven. That’s what they mean when they say settled.

Anything that does not suit the conventional wisdom shared by the group-thinking set is called junk science.

You need only read the incomparable Viv Forbes on this very site, to hear some of the compelling counter arguments against man-made climate change.

For the life of me, I cannot work out how the theory has become the reality in the face of these facts. Nonetheless, that is where we find ourselves.

Over recent years, this self-same crowd of climate loonies have also shown themselves to be arch manipulators of the science.

They take scientific data and twist it to suit their argument. Critical thinking and reasoned analysis are replaced by shouting, shaming and shenanigans.

A striking example of this is evident in the stance that gender is a fluid concept. A social construct, if you will.

Can any rational scientist argue that the combination of XY chromosomes at human conception will produce a male and a YY combination will produce a female?

Yet, we are told that this science must be disregarded as people’s gender can only be determined by how the person perceives themselves and their own gender identity.

Who tells us this? You won’t be surprised to find it is typically the same people who spuriously claim that the man-made climate change is indisputable fact.

It is certainly an interesting dichotomy which tends to invalidate their own climate eco-babble argument.

They claim the climate facts are not in dispute and all must believe. Yet, genetic science on gender determination is actually settled but must no longer be accepted.

Come to think of it, there must be some science behind gluing oneself to a road. I wonder if that’s settled.

373
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
120 Comment threads
253 Thread replies
68 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
68 Comment authors
BlackRooTommochriskMaryanneBilly B Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
Notify of
Rinaldo
Guest
Rinaldo

For how long will her majesty’s money that is held in a Rothschild Bank run the country? All money placed in a Bank is a loan to the Bank: it is not a deposit. Prof. Werner brilliantly explains how the banking system and financial sector really work. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EC0G7pY4wRE&w=840&h=473 BREXIT – Deal or No Deal It Is the Issuer of Britains Currency Which Will Decide Britains Fate. The Queen and Britain are stony broke save for that which the foreign owned non national Bank of England provides. The Crown City of London wherein is situated the Bank of England is not… Read more »

Billy B
Guest
Billy B

Watch as Ian PLIMER self destructs
Refuses to answer questions on Climate Change, on his misrepresenting others findings.
An embarrassment to all skeptics

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7FlfZyDRaU&t=12s

SonnyF
Guest
SonnyF

New post up. They’re coming thick and fast lately.

ThePhantom Returns
Guest
ThePhantom Returns

Future Climate Hysteria: Within 20 Years, You’ll Eat Insect Pizza Willingly

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/sqkVzm5Zc29uKWvZIClKyZEaYbCEPOWeP3B-eLPLt9S8izFmlBUgyhZO36p3BABnGdrjAqzZ8TutkOSOJp6HBTBWKQ=s0

Why wait 20 years? Extinction nutters should show principal and tuck in now.

ThePhantom Returns
Guest
ThePhantom Returns

Polar bear expert purged By CFACT Global warming campaigners have done an effective job at convincing the media and much of the world that polar bears are dying out. It’s not true. In fact, thanks to a hunting ban, polar bears are a major conservation success story. Their population ballooned from around 5,000 in the 1960s to (depending on whose estimate) from 22,000 to over 30,000 today. Today the North is loaded with fat, happy, fecund bears (sorry seals). It appears that telling the truth about polar bears made Dr. Susan Crockford, a respected, published Canadian zoologist, the victim of… Read more »

Bkengineering
Donor
Bkengineering

Extinction Revolution

Communism

ThePhantom Returns
Guest
ThePhantom Returns

Climate cult school kids in the near future.

https://ibb.co/sq4rXjm

Hotrocks
Guest
Hotrocks

Where’s stegal’s little stormtrooper this am ?

ThePhantom Returns
Guest
ThePhantom Returns

The father of global warming theory.
What is it about Swedes?

comment image

Arrhenius made a fundamental error in that he didn’t recognize H2O is a greenhouse gas. Knut Angstrom pointed this out in 1901, and showed experimentally that adding CO2 has very little impact on climate.

Ducktracy
Donor
Ducktracy

This is what they do to Christians. 😳😡

https://twitter.com/TomMasontime/status/1185641649365553152

ThePhantom Returns
Guest
ThePhantom Returns

The BOM used to have this web page showing the world record heatwave of 1923-1924 at Marble Bar, West Australia. Of course it has long been deleted. Can’t have the luvies reading any truths now can we?

comment image

ThePhantom Returns
Guest
ThePhantom Returns

Cooling Puerto Rico
Posted on October 19, 2019 by tonyheller

Puerto Rico has six long-term GHCN stations. Temperatures there peaked in 1925 at 104F, and afternoon temperatures have been declining a rate of 1.1F per century since 1899. Their hottest year was 1941.

comment image
comment image
comment image

pablo1
Donor
pablo1

Now that Greta the Eco Terrorist Warrior has missed out on her parents goal for a Nobel Peace prize, I wonder if they have their sights set on an Oscar and an acting career instead?…..

ThePhantom Returns
Guest
ThePhantom Returns

Plimer on Outsiders talking climate sense. I dont spose you get Sky in your welfare unit Billy? Pity you might learn something.

Poddy
Donor
Poddy

Gang of African appearance, robs bottle shop in Melbun.. The 64 years old owner with some help fights off gang and makes a citizen arrest of 1 of them..The rest wait for another gang member and storm the shop and release the captured member..VicPol arrive after the gang leave..no arrests.
Surely we should have the right to bear arms if the cops aren’t willing to protect us..
Something needs to be done about these rampaging, knuckledragging Afri ‘censored’ .. IMO

Let them eat cake
Guest
Let them eat cake

comment image

codsy
Donor
codsy

We had an aweful lot of Flannery Thunder and rain last night.The storms are right on schedule for this time of year. The weather across the Aussie Bight is right on time and I am certain that the Tropical Convergence Zone has started across the Top End. Everything seems right spot on to me. The Reef throwing out it’s eggs and sperm, which it does a few times per year. Tourist come from all over to see this. So the Reef is a happy little vegimite also. The Turtles are getting busy around Bundaburg. In fact we have passed many… Read more »

Let them eat cake
Guest
Let them eat cake

You can’t make this stuff up: Wayne Swan is currently in the United States offering the Democrats policy advice. A match made in Hell.

Ducktracy
Donor
Ducktracy

TRUMP’S CHECKMATE — Harley Schlanger

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dai5-2Exks0