Anyone who looks carefully at radiation science and the thermodynamics of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere will come to the conclusion that carbon dioxide alone cannot cause a global warming crisis. Even sensible warmists know this.

So warmists invoke “positive feedbacks” or multipliers, which they say will tip earth into runaway global warming.

Their theory is that an initial small warming will increase evaporation of water from the oceans and methane from the tundra. These two “greenhouse gases” will then cause more atmospheric warming, progressively expelling more carbon dioxide from the warming oceans. “Oceans will boil” claimed warmist leader James Hansen. They also claim that after a postulated “tipping point”, Earth will never recover its balmy equilibrium.

However, they ignore substantial negative feedbacks that act to moderate any tendency to excessive global warming. For example, evaporation cools water bodies and carries surface heat into the upper atmosphere where it dissipates to space. Extra evaporation also produces more clouds that reflect heat and cool the surface. Also methane oxidises and extra plant growth absorbs more solar energy, water vapour and carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.

Moreover, the long history of the Earth reveals periods when temperatures and carbon dioxide levels were far higher than today but life flourished and Earth always returned to cooler times – sometimes an ice age. Earth’s climate oscillates like a see-saw, with periodic changes in cycles in the sun and the solar system keeping the see-saw slowly oscillating.

There is no evidence supporting the theory of a global warming tipping point.

Today we live in a balmy climate cycle but in the grand climate cycles, the barren hungry ice is always waiting its turn.

Every human alive today is descended from a long line of smart and adaptable ancestors. Those who stay smart and adaptable will survive future see-saws of the climate.

7
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
7 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
7 Comment authors
AllenKeyesBigLewyOiglestuckingriffithGlennLee2408 Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
Notify of
AllenKeyes
Member
AllenKeyes

The LEADERS of the Phillipines are questioning our non-acceptance of the ‘science’ are they? What about the science of building tree huts on the shore in an area lashed by typhoons for centuries? For a mob whose experience with technology doesn’t extend beyond the bicycle, or the disposable cigarette lighter (the use therof, not the construction or any understanding of why hot stuff comes out the end) that’s rich.

BigLewy
Member
BigLewy

Yep Oigle, THAT orta help things along Mate <:-/

Oigle
Member
Oigle

Perhaps THIS could help Warm Something Up???
SCAREY STUFF……
ATOMIC BOMBS
Embedded Code

URL
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=9U8CZAKSsNA

stuckingriffith
Member
stuckingriffith

Two philosophies I know to be true. Firstly, ‘History is written by the victors’ and secondly, ‘nothing happens without a reason’. So as far as climate change goes and in the absence of perfect hindsight showing the results of any action we or anybody else might undertake in combating it, we can only ‘follow the money’. Who is going to get rich out of these schemes and at whose expense will the transfer of wealth take place?

GlennLee2408
Member
GlennLee2408
savery
Member
savery

The Super Typhoon wasn’t ever a Category 4. It is all MSM beat up.

NoosaDuck
Member
NoosaDuck

For the likes of the great redwood trees and the massive rain forests to flourish you need warmth and most of all Carbon dioxide for the plant and tree growth as well as ample water….It was just such a period in the cycle of the earth that such massive growth too place. The plants and trees grew to massive sizes and so did many of the animals evolve into larger and more robust models of themselves. The ice caps have been at minimal levels previously as recently as the 14th century and the land did not drown and the planet… Read more »